As the federal Liberal caucus gathered in Ottawa for its back-to-the-Hill strategy meeting, the spotlight turned once again to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s leadership. While many MPs expressed continued confidence in Trudeau, a growing number raised questions, suggesting the need for a discussion on his leadership.
Northwest Territories Liberal MP Michael McLeod proposed the idea of a routine post-election review to assess MPs’ commitment. He acknowledged the prime minister’s credibility with voters but emphasized the importance of ongoing evaluation.
Ontario Liberal MP Vance Badawey, however, focused on improving governance rather than politics, stating that he doesn’t see the need for a leadership review at present.
The debate intensified following comments by Liberal Newfoundland MP Ken McDonald, who suggested a leadership review in an interview with Radio-Canada. Later, McDonald clarified that he wasn’t personally calling for a review but acknowledged Trudeau’s smart political acumen.
Chief Government Whip Ruby Sahota and Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon disputed McDonald’s stance, emphasizing unity within the Liberal caucus. Despite some differences of opinion, MPs like Labrador MP Yvonne Jones stressed the party’s values and principles, declaring it more substantial than any individual.
This isn’t the first time concerns over Trudeau’s leadership have surfaced within the Liberal party. In November, amid declining poll numbers, longtime Liberal Sen. Percy Downe suggested Trudeau might consider stepping down to allow a new leader to emerge.
Despite internal challenges, Trudeau has reiterated his intention to lead the Liberal party into the next federal election in October 2025. The prime minister is expected to address these concerns and deliver opening remarks at the Liberal caucus retreat. The ongoing dialogue highlights the complexities and tensions within the caucus as it navigates the path forward under Trudeau’s leadership.